July 04, 2008

Iran Ponders Death Sentence to some Bloggers

Marshall Kirkpatrick at ReadWriteWeb posts a troubling story about Iran, a country who already imprisons bloggers and execute citizens at an ambitious rate. The religiously conservative government is considering execution as punishment for bloggers who establish " sites promoting corruption, prostitution and apostasy. Apostasy means the abandonment of a religion. The official Iranian news agency reports that the bill is intended to toughen punishment for harming mental security in society."

When Scoble and I were writing our book we had a good deal of trouble finding the right title. The book began as "The Red Couch," and became "Naked Conversations." For a lng time in-between, we wanted to name it "Blog or Die," until Steven Streight sent us a crisp comment, "In too many countries, the choice is really 'blog AND die.' Your title is in extremely poort taste."

We could not argue with his viewpoint and changed the name of the book in response. It seems to me the petty battles of some if us bloggers in the West are dwarfed by the harsh realities of everyday people who risk imprisonment and execution exercizing rights that we in the West consider "self evident."

Happy Independence Day all you US citizens out there. Let us be happy for what we have.

[NOTE; The BBC's Cyrus Farivar just contacted me. He has posted a more indepth file on PRI's The World.

February 15, 2008

Hillary Clinton's Open Mouth Policy

Okay, this is kind of mean, and I don't want it to impact who you Americans out there vote for president. It's a question that came to me during Super Tuesday and I have not deeply researched it, but do any of you recall seeing a picture of Hillary Clinton with her mouth closed?

I've been taking note over the past 10 days, and every shot I see has her jaw wide open. What's that all about? Oversized dentures? Nasal congestion? Advice from a bad campaign manager?

Maybe our friend Hugh MacLeod should sell her the GapingVoid handle. Come to think of it, she may be a bit short on cash, what with that bad $5 million investment she recently talked about. Maybe she could just use GapingVoidette.

Anyway, if you have a shot f her with mouth shut, please post or send it to me. Also Hugh, now that the link got your attention, how about a nice cartoon showing us why Hillary's mouth is always open?

February 04, 2008

Best political ad I've seen

OK, in the interest of transparency, I am voting for Barak Obama tomorrow. It will be with the greatest passion and least ambivalence I have felt in voting for a presidential candidate in my lifetime.

But even if that were not the case, this ad is the best political ad I can recall seeing. If it were not my candidate, I would still love the message and style and positive attitude.  It is not actually an ad, but a 5 minute video clip, from something called DipDive. I got it from a Twitter friend. If anyone knows the story behind it, please leave it as a comment.

January 14, 2008

Astroturfing & getting slimed inside the beltway

Geoff Livingston, whose PR practice inside the beltway is primarily for technology clients talks about astroturfing and ther slimey practices of political PR practtitoners inside the Washington DC beltway.

For you youngsters out there, astroturfing is a term coined by one Charles Colson who worked in the White House for Richard Nixon.  Whenever a newspaper or broadcast station said something unfavorable about the President, the news organization would be inundated with calls and letters in defense of the president--all produced by a small handful of paid Colson Lieutenants.

Colson called it "astroturfing." The campaign looked like grassroots, but in fact it was artificial like the stuff at the Houston Astrodome.

Geoff reports that the practice remains widespread among DC PR practitioners, news that I find far from shocking, but still depressing.  To date politicians have used social media to get the word out and to get money in. Some day, I hope they learn about its conversational value.

January 13, 2008

Chinese beat blogger to death; ban Paul Walsh for reporting it

Yesterday, Paul Walsh reported that Wei Wenhau, 41, a Chinese construction company executive, was beaten to death by Chinese authorities for unauthorized video blogging. This, he reported has led to thousands of Chinese expressing outrage on internet chatrooms. He also admonished Google's "disgraceful behavior" in it's policy of complicity with the Chinese government while touting a slogan of "Do no evil."

Today, Paul reports that his blog, Segala has been banned in China. Paula writes that he is doing precisely what many Chinese bloggers do. He is using a proxy server to bypass the Chinese censors.

But there may be a curve ball, that would be a new one on me. I just tried to subscribe to Segala with my Google Reader and could not.  This could be some sort of tech glitch, but I tried three times. Coincidence, perhaps. Perhaps not. A few weeks ago, when I was writing about Egypt's Wael Abbas, who posts videos on YouTube about police briutality, YouTube temporarily took his videos down before restoring them. youTube is of course, owned by Google.


December 23, 2007

Personal Democracy Forum Accuses TechCrunch of Identity Theft

Through Robert Scoble's shared items, I learned about Micah Sifry, a founder of the Personal Democracy Forum and author of the TechPresident blog has accused Michael Arrington and TechCrunch of identity theft.  Micah says he sent Mike a nice email note asking to resolve the issue which went unanswered. He also sent it to another TechCrunch exec who promised to speak to Arrington.  Then Arrington went onto national TV talking about how he wanted TechCrunch to set criteria for the next president.

I have been chiding TechCrunch for the silliness of the apparent results of the Techcrunch Presidential Poll . If this poll means the tech community should seriously back Ron Paul whose currently way ahead, then I would argue the tech sector will have no real influence on the election outcome. On closer reading I've discovered that you can vote once per day, rather than just once, which hints that TechCrunch is looking for more traffic rather than an accurate pulse read on the tech community preferences.

Micah's charge is far more serious than mine. He has escalated his issue in a very short time and it is fair to wait to hear how Arrington responds to it and personally I think it would be wise for him to respond.

December 22, 2007

Techcrunch Poll. Vote as often as you like

I wrote a few days ago about the silliness of the Techcrunch Poll where Ron Paul continues to be the runaway leader among all candidates and Dennis Kucinich leads among Democrats. Still true, but I can change all that.

I voted for my choice a second time. It went through without a problem. It's like Florida 2000 for the rest of us. I wish I could talk longer, but I thing I'll go back and give my own candidate a few more votes.

December 20, 2007

TechCrunch Poll: It's a Ron Paul landslide

TechCrunch may have wanted to increase its influence when it asked readers to take a partisan vote for president based on the tech-related positions of each hopeful. Right now, Ron Paul is by far the top vote getter in either party with more than twice the votes of all Democrats combined.  Among Democrats, Dennis Kucinich is snugly in the lead over Barack Obama.

This may say more about the TechCrunch constituency than it does for the likely outcome of the upcoming election.

December 09, 2007

Techcrunch post detects whole stockpile of smoking guns in Sam Sethi saga

This is getting ridiculous.

Michael Arrington weighs in
with a mysteriously received dubiously dated Blognation term sheet for a half million pounds from Secora, and ailing British Venture firm. The post is the tip of the dirtpile. Read the comments and watch the story unravel.

October 17, 2007

Beijing, Bush & the Dalai Lama

Every now and then, I just cannot avoid stepping into a political bucket. It's off topic for this blog and I usually get shouted at by someone, but today's simultaneous recognition by Congress and President Bush, who attended the Dalai Lama's Congressional Gold Medal Award ceremony, is the first time that the current president and Congrees have done something together that I whole-heartedly endorse.

In fact, it is only the second time I can recall Bush doing something I considered praiseworthy and courageous, the first being a reasonable approach to the issue of illegal immigrants, which was squelched by both political parties. Bush becomes the first US President t be photographed with the Dalai Lama.  Neither Clinton nor Carter ever dared for fear of pissing off China.

And China has made clear that it is indeed pissed off.  They don't like the Dalai Lama, because after they took his country (Tibet) away from him, and burned its ancient temples to the ground, lots of Tibetans and freedom loving people in the world, wanted him to get his country back

That's unlikely to happen. And in the end, the US is as unlikely to take further action toward that goal, as China is likely to do more than shout a bit over the recognition bestowed on this victim of their expansion.

China and the US have grown too interdependent on each other to escalate over this issue.  And Tibet is too tiny, devoid of resources and remote for the US to do much.

But it's nice to see Congress and the President get together and do something decent for a religious leader who has inspired a great many people and who has continued to carry himself with strength and dignity through his life in forced exhile.

August 06, 2007

Hillary Clinton and the 'have-a-beer' Factor

I watched the Democratic presidential panel (it wasn't really a debate) Yearly Kos convention on Ustream Saturday.  While I was exhilarated by  the citizen participation and what it forebodes for American politics, I was disappointed in the performance of the two Democrat front runners. The closer Barack Obama comes to being electable, the more cautious and less candid he becomes. Worse than him, it seemed to be, was the performance of Hillary Clinton, who seems to be able to hide any possible hint of a human inside her thickening veneer.

She reminded me of something I had learned, long ago, before I was even old enough to vote, when I was a copy boy for the old Boston Herald Traveler, a newspaper that bares no resemblance to its descendant, the Herald American.

This was back in 1963.  A copy editor named Jack Cook, took me under his wing.  He was pehaps my first journalistic mentor.  He also loaned me his 1949 Volkswagen when I had big dates and the car certainly increased my cool factor over using the MBTA to take a coed home.

I was worried about Goldwater stealing the election from Lyndon Johnson and Jack explained to me the "have a beer factor."  Jack had covered politics for more than 20 years.  He was an expert on the Boston rough house style.

When it comes to the presidency, he taught me, it's not about ideology.  Neither is it about domestic or foreign policy. If it was about experience, then Nixon would easily have beaten that junior senator from Massachusetts, Jack Kennedy.

Jack's point was not about the impact of alcohol.  It was more about the conversation, the way it would have been described in the early 60s. Jack, I'm sure is long gone, but over the years, the have-a-beer concept of just sitting down and chatting with the person who would be president. There is something about the image that says, the other person is accessible and knows enough about you--even if you disagree--to somehow look at the world with a bit of your eyes in the White House vision.

People would indeed rather have a beer with Jack Kennedy than Richard Nixon. George Bush senior had his faults, but he seemed more human and accessible than did his his opponent Michael Dukakis.  There are very few nice things I have to say for the current son of Bush, but he did seem like someone easier to have a beer with than the Al Gore that ran against him or the John Kerry who followed.

Can you picture sitting down and having a beer, or even a white wine spritzer with Hillary Clinton? I cannot. On the other hand, I would love to have a beer with Bill Clinton, and in that, there may be an essential difference between the current candidate and her husband.





July 03, 2007

KD Paine Reports on meeting Barak Obama

KD Paine went to one of those "meet-the-candidate" things that New Hampshire is famous for and gets to look Barack Obama in the eye.  The result is Obama gets another committed supporter and we get this fine piece of citizen journalism from KD.

June 28, 2007

John Edwards ,Ustream & the future of Democracy

John Edwards Ustreamed yesterday to have a live conversation with his supporters This is another first, not just for Ustream, because it is larger than Ustream. Live online video lets candidates for offices anywhere have interactive conversations with constituents.

I think, over time, this new technology will change voting and campaigns for the better.  I was recently disappointed by a panel of political professionals at the Supernova conference. They talked lots about using the Internet to get their message out and to get money in, but they seemed oblivious to the concept of using the Internet to have conversations with voters.

Livestream lets voters see the faces of candidates and hear them as they answer chatroom questions. This is closer to a face-to-face conversation that most of us get. Most candidates are prepped to the sort of questions the media will ask them on commercial TV.

But they are often taken by surprise when real people, with authentic concerns ask them obvious questions on issues that concern them.

May 21, 2007

Russia's virtual warfare & why we should worry

Here we are, just a few years into the new Millennium and already we have discovered there are two new kinds of warfare.

First, is the one that is so visually horrific.  It is the one being waged by Al Qaeda against anyone who is not Al Qaeda. This is a war of terror and everyone gets it instantly. It is marked by towering infernos, rubble and dead bodies.  It has the drama of walls of flame and the mutilation of innocent civilians. Everyone sees it and gets it and understands why the world would be a better place if we could figure out how to bring it to an end.

Second and more recently, is a much less dramatic assault as the International Herald Tribune points out, Russia has the become the first nation to use cyber assaults on another nation. It's three waves of cyber attacks on little Estonia can hardly be called horrific. But, as the Herald Tribune points, out, they are acts of a new kind of "virtual War, one in which there can be real victims.  While, there are no walls of flames and only one dead body so far, we have just entered a new era defined by a new danger. Even my Estonian friends consider what has happened so far to be merely inconvenient. Business and e-government are slowed. The tiny country is small enough that it can cut off international internet communications and survive without  irretrievable losses. For those reasons, most people in the US and most of the West frown at  what has happened, but they are not terribly alarmed.  Even inside Estonia, life goes on pretty much as it did before the cyber attacks.

But, if you think about it, this latter form of assault could be as devastating as more dramatic acts of terror. Russia has a 100-year history filled with incidents of it bullying smaller neighbors as well as its own dissident citizens. Estonia well remembers that the Russians can be marsh harsher than what has happened so far.

But we all need to remember that weapons of warfare always begin as primitive things. The first three cyber assaults launched by one country against another are probably the most primitive that the world will experience. Now that it has been done with some success bad guys, like Russia are likely to get a lot better at it and the targets of such assaults are likely to  get a lot bigger and be located a lot further in the west.

Estonia can protect its banks and e-government and law enforcement facilities just by shutting down external access for a while. What would happen if such an attack were launched on the United States.  If this country shuts down its cyber borders then world trade ges most seriously hampered.

But again, cyber attacks are new and primitive from what they will become.  If you let your imagination wander for just a bit, you can see a very frightening scenario unfolding. Picture the shuffling of personal, medical and financial data records exonerating criminals and tainting citizens above suspicion.  Picture the corruption of IRS data, the mixing of hospital prescriptions between patients, the calling up of police and fire resources, the destruction of email and so on.

None of this can be accomplished today.  It will take some time and work. But it's a good guess that right now, the bad guys are on the case, while governments are scratching their headson what to do about this and most people are not considering for the most part, that Russia's little assault on Esnia has actually made the world a much more dangerous place than it already was.





May 07, 2007

Skype's Sten Tamkivi Weighs in on Russia-Estonia

Sten Tamkivi, Skype COO
[Skype's Sten Tamkivi, October, 2006. Photo by Shel]

I had requested Sten Tamkivi, Skype's general manager for eCommerce and Estonia, answer a few questions for my recent post about the Russian-Estonian frictions. His comments came in this morning.  He takes a different view than the one I presented.

Following is the full text of the email he sent me:

" The Russian cyber attacks that made the news recently are obviously a serious matter for law enforcement, but I don't think their immediate impact is that significant. I am very saddened by the political context leading to these conflicts and hoping for a resolution along with the vast majority of peace-minded Estonians and Russians. Naturally there are different views on history, but our future needs to be common.

Skype has never had any issues with the ethnicity of talent -- whether a programmer is Estonian, Russian or Chinese. There is bureaucratic red tape around EU's internal free movement of labour rules, which makes it harder to hire if the country of origin for talent is outside EU.

That said, we have several Russian citizens working for Skype in Tallinn today, and a significant percentage of our Tallinn-based employees are ethnic Russians who work side by side with people from some 30 nationalities. Skype helps people reach out to one other -- both as a piece of software and as a company.

Sten has also posted some observations on his personal blog.

May 06, 2007

Russia's Cyber Assault on little Estonia

IMG_0784
[Former Estonian KGB Headquarters. They cemented over the basement windows, so you couldn't hear the shrieks when you walked by. Photo by Shel ]

You could not miss the statue if you were in Estonia.During my brief visit, the bronze monument to a Red Army soldier, erected by occupying Russians in 1947 seems to be where all roads passed by. The Russians said it was to memorialize Russia's liberation of estonia from the Nazis.  The Estonians saw it as the symbol of 50 years of recent Soviet oppression and seeing as it is now their country, they decided to move it to a less conspicuous locale.

They were, perhaps, insensitive in how they handled it, moving it abruptly at night, thus pissing off not just the considerable Russian population in Estonia but the Russian government as well. Now, all Hell has broken out, with riots and military threats and the Estnian Embassy in Russia under siege.

Pretty much ignored in the US, the incident and resulting escalations has been big news in parts of Europe and the lead story in Russia three days running. There has been talk of reigniting the Cold War because Estonia, the smallest and most technologically advanced of the former Soviet Bloc, is a NATO ally and the US is bound to defend allies against attack if it should ever come to that.

While tanks are not imminently running across any borders just yet, Russia has most decidedly been attempting to intimidate, frustrate and incapacitate its tiny neighbor. Perhaps the most effective ofi ts arsenal has been cyber-hacking, which for brief periods last week cut off online communications inside and outside the Estonian government and denied the rest of the world access to much of Estonia online.

Tim Watson's Dark Reading reported many government sites including Parliament, the office of the prime minister and even the police department were unreachable online for several days "after hackers launched denial-of-service attacks that rendered many of their sites useless."

It turns out those hackers were working on Russian government computers.

Estonia's Justice Minister Rein Lang followed the IP addresses to Moscow, where he ascertained the smoking cyberguns were in official Kremlin hands, the independent Baltic News Service [BNS] reported. The BNS also said there had been malicious attempts to bring down Estonia's data communications network, which would cut off exchanges between state institutions and agencies. Estonia was fairly quick in restoring its sites, but to defend itself, it had to temporarily cut off foreign access to all Estonian sites, turning itself into digital island.

Russians also attempted multiple assaults on private sites as well, including Delfi, Estonia's leading web portal. Rate.ee, an Estonian social network site doing business in Russia reported that public speaking invitations at Russian events had been abruptly withdrawn.

Using cyber assaults against Estonia could be devastating. Some 95 percent of the country enjoys free and ubiquitous access. When the Soviet Empire finally released Estonia from under its yoke in 1993, Estonia had virtually no legacy commerce to speak of, so it began building an infrastructure from scratch, focusing efforts on what was the newest way to do business--the Internet. Today, Estonia is among world leaders in internet data encryption, e-commerce transactions, e-gambling.  The nation's infrastucture and economics are internet dependent. it has a healthy economy with full employment.

Estonia's government is among the world's most internet interactive.  In tallinn, you can vote from your home via the Internet. If you choose, you can talk back to the head of the tax department. Most people have free Internet connection at home, but if you do not, it's pretty much free and ubiquitous. Government officials universally boast that they use the Internet to serve, not control. Estonia President Toomas Hendrik Ilves

[Tallinn President Toomas Ives in his office, October 2006. Photo by Shel.]

When I interviewed President Toomas Ilves, who performed bravely last week, standing up to the Russians, the former Columbia University professor madeclear that Internet technology was intended primarily for people to "take information and back opinion." Entrepreneurs seem to have remarkable access to  government officials. Skype COO Stem Tamkivi told me how he could call up any senior official in the country to discuss Skype's needs. His was not implying Skype had special clout, but was emphasizing people's access to government. Mart Laar, who served twice as prime minister, fantasized to me about his using the Internet to eliminate Parliament, letting citizens to argue and vote directly on critical issues once weekly.

I'm of the opinion the countries that do business with ecah other rarely invade each other.  Business people I know there see great potential and the recent fracas has to be more than a bit of a setback in that direction.

Skype officials would not speak to me for attribution on this subject, but conceded to me they had pretty much tapped Estonia's pool of technology talent and would love to import Russian and Ukrainian talent, an idea not embraced lovingly last october by government or fellow Estonians. "People here think we've had enough Russians in this country," I was told.

My friend Allan Martinson, founder of Martinson Trigon Venture Partners , A VC firm doing business in both the Baltic states Russia bases his strategy on area business synergies. Objective, in every conversation, I've had with him, he expressed fears the situation is worsening and are bringing in a new Cold War.

" Doing business always helps to understand the other. But I am afraid it will be increasingly difficult. We are already getting unpleasant signals... . Many things are put on hold to see how the situation evolves. I am afraid the Russian government will use administrative pressure to keep Estonian-related business out of Russia," he told me.

Connection,

[Estonian schoolgirl in uniform, sitting in 800-year-old doorway, online on a Mac. Photo by Shel.]

It seems to me, that like most conflicts, culture clash is at the core. Estonia is a bottom up country with an accessible government. Russia's is not.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, a former KGB operative has an apparent penchant for accelerating hostilities with the west whenever an important Russian election looms. He is not a bottom up guy. He seems to enjoy making his neighboring members of the former Soviet Union nervous with little reminders of what Russia is capabe of doing to them.

Estonians do not need reminding. It is less than 15 years since the Russians left.  The landmarks are still there.  The cultural quirks remains. Anyone over age 30 has an unpleasant personal story to tell about the occupation.

And that goes back to the statue, which until its recent relocation, served to remind Estonians, day-after-day that freedom and security are often delicate things that can easily be lost. They do not see the Russians as liberators from the Nazis, not for one minute.

In fact, Russia invaded Estonian for the first time in 1939, a full year before the Nazis pushed the Russians out. Stalin's Red Army was not screwing around.  They sent in 100,000 soldiers, one for every 10 Estonians.

When the Russians wrested conrol of Estonia back again in 1944, it was immediately clear it was an occupation built to last and it did for more than 50 years. Estonians recall it as a harsher occupation than the Nazis meted out. The Soviets assaulted the country's culture. In two raids executed on two separate nights, the Soviets gathered up a total of 100,000 Estonians, many of them the nation's brightest and boldest. Some were deported to Siberia or elsewhere in Russia. Others were just dragged into the woods and shot.

The Soviets then exported about 100,000 loyal Russians into Estonia to serve as occupation  gatekeepers, bureaucrats and, of course, "citizen observers. Russians still remain there, comprising the bulk of the country's 400,000 non-Estonian residents. There has been extremely little assimilation between cultures.

Sorry for the historic digression, but it's relevant to today and I am writing this because I think what is going on is more relevant than most people realize. Cyber hacking is one thing, but saber rattling is also starting to be heard--or maybe it's just old-fashioned bullying.

The vice chairman of the Russian parliament last week suggested Russia organize a major military campaign at its Estonian border.  Speaking happily on the record, he said some soldiers may "mistakenly" go into Estonia and destroy historic and cultural landmarks, then withdraw, "after which we will apologize, of course."  The Estonian Embassy in Moscow has been virtually under siege, surrounded by angry Russians, rumored to be getting paid to hurl rocks and epitaphs at the Embassy staff and their families.

In Estonia, the moving of the bronze Russian in Tallinn has led to unprecedented riots.  Shouting, "Russia! Russia!" looters have assaulted Estonian liquor stores and raided the racks of Gucci and Amani shops. There have been over 1,000 arrests and at least one death. No one is optimistic that the worst has already occurred.

Elsewhere in Russian news last week was a report of the Russians bulldozing yet another Soviet- statue into smithereens. Perhaps, little Estonia should have been more forceful than the polite relocation it had intended.


April 01, 2007

The Two Barack Obamas

I am struck by the two images I'm developing on Barack Obama, two very divergent senses of who he is. The first is formed mostly from his two books.  I read "Dreams from my Father," a few weeks ago and it inspired me. Now, I've just started the "Audacity of Hope," and on Page 7. he just hits to the nerve of what I think this country is about when he writes:

"What struck me was just how modest modest people's hopes were, how much of they believed seemed to hold constant across race, region, religion and class. most of them thought that anybody willing to work shoulld be able to find a job that paid a living wage.  They figured that people shouldn't have to file for bankruptcy because they are sick.  They believed that every child should have a genuinely good education, and ... those same children should be able to go to college even if their parents weren't rich. They wanted to be safe from criminals and from terrorists; they wanted clean air, clean water and time with their kids. And when they go old, they wanted to be able to retire with some dignity and respect."

Now understanding this and being able to state it so simply is not enough to make me vote for him.  But it is enough to make me have an audacious hope that he shows me and the rest of the electorate enough in addition so that we can vote for him for president.

But the there's the other side. The one that runs this lame, blog-like thing.  It is only one directional.  It is designed to get you to give money and to attend his events, where you will be asked to give money. It is designed in the traditional red-white-blue of nearly every American candidate.  If you register for more information, as I did, you start getting spammed to give money and attend events where you will be harangued to give money. If you email them to tell them how you feel, you get an auto reply that says they are overwhelmed by the number of emails they are receiving.  If you wait a month, as I did, and ask to be removed from the email list, you get the identical "overwhelmed" response.

Overwhelmed is not something I want in a president.

My point is this: If our voters are going to turn to Obama this year, it is because we are tired of the tried and true politicians.  We want someone new and different.  We want a visionary optimist and his books indicate he is that person. His campaign does not.  His campaign is the same combination of pablum and crap that we get from the usual gang of candidates. If we want more of the same as his campaign operatives are giving us, Barack has less history and fewer achievements than at least five other candidates.

That brings us to Hilary. More about her shortly.


March 26, 2007

Kathy Sierra Receiving Death Threats

Just yesterday, I wrote that Kathy Sierra is among my favorite bloggers.  Today, it's going rapidly around the blogosphere that Kathy has received a series of ugly, twisted, perverted and frightening death threats. Two prominent bloggers, Jeneane Sessum,, of Blogher and Christopher Locke a Cluetrain co-author appear to be directly or indirectly involved.

Scoble says he is so upset he is taking the week off.  I'm not going to do that, but I have to say I need to step back for a second. I somehow did not expect something like this to happen.  It saddens and frightens me that it did. Kathy is one of the finest voices in marketing in the blogosphere or out. And for anonymous scumbags or famous bloggers to do something this goddam ugly just makes me very, very sad.

I wish I had a profound or dramatic statement to make but I don't. I wish there was something I could do or say to make it better for Kathy, but there isn't.

I think tonight I'll just go watch TV. It's safer.

March 06, 2007

Hey Barack! That was slightly slick

It was only a tad bit deceptive, but deceptive all the same. About a half hour ago, I received some email from someone named Barack Obama.  Now, while I don't personally know anyone by that name, I have heard of a Barack Obama.  I've read two books by him and think highly of the guy.

So I opened the email. It turns out that it wasn't from Barack at all, but from a committee trying to raise funds to help the guy get a new job. It even bore a scanned replica of his actual signature.

Now political committees do this sort of thing.  Thy do a lot worse. But the reason I happen to like this Obama guy so much is because he seems to set a new standard for transparency.  He has built a personal brand that makes me expect more of him than of other candidates.

So I sent back an email politely saying how I felt. Sure enough, within seconds some robot server sent me back a quick note explaining that the campaign is overwhelmed by 20,000 emails a week and they wish they could reply more directly. This too was signed by Obama.

Now, it's early on in this campaign. Several candidates are looking better than average to me. But one of the places where I am going to watch as closely as I can, is in the area of how funds are raised and from whom they have been raised.

This is far from enough to stop me from voting for Obama. I am far from ready to declare my support so I am certainly not ready to send a donation. Ths emailing put me a small step further away from that point.

March 03, 2007

The Presidential Race:What I did not hear

I talked a lot of politics this week.  Uncharacteristic for me, I listened more than I spoke. I was impressed with the quality of what I heard from people who come from all sorts of neighborhoods on the political spectrum.

My favorite quote of the week goes to a Republican with whom I usually disagree.  However, I completely agree with this statement:

"If Robert Gates had been Bush's first Defense Secretary, the country and the Republicans wouldn't have to swim upstream on Shit's Creek right now."

But mostly this week I was impressed with what I did not hear:

  • I did not hear that Hilary Clinton should or should not be elected because she's a woman.
  • I did not hear that Barak Obama should or should not be eleced president because he is black, or at least half-black.
  • I did not hear that Rudolph Giuliani should or should not be elected because he is on his third wife.
  • I did not hear whether or not Bill Richardson should or should not be elected president because he is Hispanic. Unfortunately for him, I did not hear him mentioned this week.

Personally, this seem to me to be a good thing.  People seem to be addressing issues rather than genes and hues. besides, we've had a long string of white men running America, and during my time here, we can only give them mixed reviews.

This last week, I did hear a lot of passion  and optimism about having a new president, any new president. I heard much talk about health care, and almost nothing about immigration. Everyone is for it, but no one seems to know what "it" is, but the topic seems to be helping Clinton.

I heard about the war. It is becoming a general perception that whoever gets elected will get us out, and most people don't want to think about what happens after that.

But there was a word I heard several times related to the presidency and politics.  It was a surprising word to hear in that context: "decency." People want to see more of it, and I think that's a good thing.



February 26, 2007

Lunch with Floyd Kvamme

I had the good fortune at the Tech Policy summit to find myself seated next to E. Floyd Kvamme (pronounced Kwammee) who is Partner Emeritus as the legendary VC firm of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. He was also a co-founder of National Semiconductor.  What I respect so much about Kwamme is that he became a VC back in the days when VCs loved and understood risk.  Back then they bet on technology and teams and yes, they knew it was a bet. They usually lost most times they invested, but when they hit it out of the park, it was a grand slammer.

Kvamme and I talked about the Silicon Valley of the early 80s, but that was not what made it so interesting.  It seems that much of his time and passion  is serving as co-chair of George W. Bush's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. For long time readers of this blog, you know that I am not quite what you would call a Bush supporter. I look forward to the day when we can call him ex-president Bush.

Kvamme talked about how he knows George Bush as an individual and what a shame it is that people don't have the access to see what a fine and decent person he is "as a human being." He talked about Vinod Khosla, who had been my client when he was a youthful co-founder of Sun Microsystems, my first startup client as a young PR practitioner. Vinod's political views remain quite liberal on social issues, as they had been when I talked politics with Vinod more than 20 years ago. But Kvamme had dragged Khosla into US Department of Energy circles, as an expert on global energy reform.

The point of this reminded me of an era that was so many years earlier.  When people who feel like I feel could sit down with more conservative contemporaries. We could argue with great passion into the a.m. hours of the night. But somehow we could part as friends.  We understood that we both sincerely cared about our country and doing the right things and yet disagree on such a fundamental basis.

I'm not sure when such discussions became angry and ugly, but they did.  We on the left find happiness in talking with those who see it our way as do the conservatives.  Every four years, we compete for the votes of what few people there are hanging out in the political center, then we go back to our corners.

Maybe it's time to change back to the way it was. Or maybe, it never was that way and i like to remmeber my own personal history through a romantic lens.

Walt interviews Jonathan Schwartz

Walt asks: the Sun Micro CEO what its policy is.  "To lower the cost of the network at all points." Good answer.

Jonathan is a great story teller.  Talks about how electricity was used only by JP Morgan and the richest people on Earth at first and then was made affordable to almost everyone in the world.  Schwartz wants it to be open and affordable to everyone.

Schwartz is not advocating a national broadband policy, but recognizes that nations who have it seem to provide better service.  Schwartz thinks government has a role to play and it needs to look at the issue.

Schwartz likened Sun's broadband policy to the automotive industry where double decker buses, which moves massive number of people doing the same thing, going toward the same destination.  They also want to help smaller companies by offering the option of cool cars.

Scwartz: the Internet is a place that allows all people access to the same information at the same time.  Instead, the SEC says you have to go somewhere like Businesswire. As we move forward, the Internet should be a vehicle for satisfying the regulatory requirements of full and fair disclosure for public companies instead of say the Wall Street Journal, where Mossberg works.

Schwartz: the Journal may have a more inciteful look at the news, but Schwartz is referring to the Sun requirement to release timely nfo.  Jonathan wants to do it on his blog.

Jonathan says his blog is just another voice in the marketploace.  People want more choices. Jonathan is asked how much time he spends on his blog.  As he told us in Naked Conversations "It fills a lot of the void, while he's waiting for a plane or on hold in a phone talk.

The only time Jonathan gets edited s right after an earnings release.  Then the lawyers take a look to be safe.

Asked why he's straddling the fence of national broadband policy.  A great answer: "For fear of what happens next."

Walt notes that Jonathan wants government to study other countries.  Jonathan notes that some of these countries are not democracies.

Question from Dan Farber.  It's Sun's 25th birthday. How do you define "blog?" Your's seems more like a company newsletter.  How do you define it.  Jonathan says Sun't marketpl;ace is a highly tactical marketplace.  I am talking to Sun customers and I talk directly t them.  I don't get distracted by discussing things out of my domain.

Question on strategic initiatives.  J: energy efficiency is a huge issue for us. urrently cheaper to FedEx a pedabyte of data to Beijing by FedEx than over the Internet. The tape doesn't use energy when it is not being used. We are doing it because it makes business sense, not just because we support the environment.

Schwartz was among my favorite interviews for Naked Conversations.  This is the 4th time I've seen him speak.  It seems to me he has one of the fastest and broadest minds in any room. He has a great deal of my respect.

Live @ the Tech Policy Summit: Mossberg interviews Cicconi

I just arrived at the Tech Policy Summit in San Jose where Walt Mossberg is about to interview AT&T muckymuck  James CicconiDarknet author JD Lasica has just handed a copy of his book on how Hollywood is usurping people's right to remix and share their digital property to previous speaker Cong. Howard Berman who could learn something from it.

Cicconi is telling Walt how technically hip digital Neanderthal Ted Stevens is and Walt is challenging him.

Walt wants to know why AT&T should choose what people add to their network.  Cicconi says device manufacturers use varied technologies and the carriers should decide what we users get to plug into what. Cicconi argues that the devices are subsidized and therefore the carriers should have a say for that reason.  If consumers want choice, then the subsidy needs to go away.

Walt:  I don't have to ask permission to take a Mac and plug it in with an ISP. Why is it that AT&T and Verizon get to decide what handset plugs in and why not the user like with computers.  Cicconi keeps smiling and is using many words about customer satisfaction so AT&T has to eliminate devices with limitations for their own good, to ensure everything works properly.  Cicconi notes that Apple Computer, mentioned by Walt follows and end to end strategy for quality of end user experience. Apple exercises a higher degree of software control.  Cicconi says what carriers are doing is better than the government doing it but he doesn't seem to have anything to say about endusers being the decision maker.

Walt asks for Cicconi's view on Net Neutrality.  C: Within limits Net Neutrality is a good idea.  Argues that ATT won't bar any consumer from connecting any device to the network. We are constantly chasing after the hypothesized abuses.  People want to restrict how we manage our own backbone traffic where we have invested billions of dollars.

Walt: Why does the US suck at bandstream?  Why is it better in Japan, Korea and "god.. France....FRANCE. " Why can't we do that? Cicconi: Variety of reasons.  US competition just heating up in last five years. C: we have to build out all areas at once, so that's why we can't even get Manhattan running fast. Walt: would it be better if we got government off your backs: Cicconi does not really answer.  He talks about having to negotiate with all US communities simultaneously.

National Broadband Policy.  Cicconi thinks we should have one and then AT&T will not have to negotiate with every town. It also means carrier lobbyists will be able to influence congressman and save lobbying money.

NOTE:  I'm taking pictures ut forgot to bring my cable to connect them.  I'll add pictures in later.

December 30, 2006

What Scoble Can Teach John Edwards

Over at the John Edwards Blog, Mickeleh gives his take on the importance of Scoble's coverage. Now, a quick look-around does not tell me just who Mickeleh is and that would be helpful, but I find it interesting that the site is apparently posting some analysis of what's going on rather than the boosterism I'm finding on so many other political sites.

Mickeleh, it seems to me, has written a pretty good piece, with a clear understanding of social media as a toolset that allows transparency. But, I think he or she misses a very key point about Scoble's being there. Robert's most significant contribution to blogging is that he taught the rest of us how to put a human face on corporate blogging.

One thing most voters in the world would agree upon is that we could use more human faces on the suits who run for office. So far Edwards is out in front in trying to attempt this. He is not yet there. If he does achieve the sort of transparency that Scoble has proven is possible to achieve, then I believe he will be our next president.

That is, of course, if we voters like what we see.
Technorati Tags: ,

powered by performancing firefox